Around the year 2000
I joined the crew of relay stations Heerenveen. After a few years of writing
software for mobile radios, relay stations are much more interesting because of
all other aspects around the radio hobby. All repeaters from Heerenveen at that
point were retuned Storno radio’s, these have worked fine for years.
Later we decided
to use the nice looking RS9044 because of its specifications, shortly after the
RS9044 we replaced the transceiver by a diversity system of the same brand. The
RS9045 is for 90 percent the same as the RS9044 but with one more receiver, an
extra IF circuit and a noise detection circuit to determine the best signal.
Since both receivers are identical, fast switching between receivers on the fly
will not be heard.
Output frequency: 430.025MHz
Input frequency: 431.625MHz
CTCSS controlled: 82.5Hz (under normal circumstances)
QTH: JO32WW
Repeater is
carrier operated, but when using CTCSS the squelch will be opened even if your
signal is very weak. At the moment the CTCSS option is disabled because of
merging PI2HVN with the Coversity project.
After replacing
the Storno radio’s we had one major challange: a spurious signal which appears at
the input frequency as soon the transmitter is on air, causing the station to stay
on air and oscillate.
In some
circumstances, depending on the weather, the relay station kept itself on-air
once the transmitter was switched on by a user. A loud oscillating sound was
heard and somebody had to climb the building again to shut it off. This issues
lasted for years, a few weekends leaving the spectrum analyser at the location logging
the spurious, replacing cables and antenna, replacing transceivers... Everytime
we thought we had solved this issues, it came back withing a few weeks.
The goal is to
make the receiver as sensitive as possible, this is good for a faw away station
but unfortunately also for a very weak annoying signal. The spectrum analyser
is not that sensitive by far, it sees a signal at -90dB while the receiver is
as good as -140dB.
The problems
started around the same period we replaced the Storno, so at a certain point
there was a doubt about the Radiosystem. To exclude spurious from the PA, the
PA was replaced by a completely different amplifier. No result, still
oscillating from time to time.
To make the
confusion even bigger, the disturbing signal appears at a few particular transmitter
power levels, but also depending on temperature, moisture etc.. It seemed
reproducable at 13W most of the time, but sometimes it appears only at 8W or
15W output power.
Next experiment
was using two different mobile radio’s, one for transmitting and the other for
receiving the same time. This was more difficult because the receiver of the
mobile radio is not that selective as the receiver of the RS9044, the strong
signal of the transmitter could be a problem for the mobile receiver.
Fortunately, the disturbing signal showed up at a very low power as well! The
mobile receiver did also receive the signal at the reception frequency of the
relay station, the proof was there: It is not our equipement but from the
outside!
To be sure about
the Radiosystem, we went to a place far away from any possible interfering
signal.
After doing our
very best with quite high power, manipulating the position of the transmitter
and receiver antenna, a church song appeard out of our relay. The transmitter
frequency at that moment was 430.875MHz, and the receiver at the original
431.625MHz. The difference was 750kHz, close to a radio station in the
Netherlands at 747kHz which was indeed in the middle of a church program that
moment. Okay, when stressing the radio’s front-end it is always possible to
create intermodulation.
Then, at the
location of the station it could be passive intermodulation. The whole building
where the station is located is covered with metal. Any oxidation between the
nails in the wall could cause a diode effect and generate unwanted signals. So
while the relay was oscillating, we walked around the building and pushed the
walls and antenna hoping the oscillation stops or at least changes. It didn’t.
At a certain
moment i put my handheld transceiver on top of the central heating system, just
didn’t want to keep it in my hands all the time. When searching for the
disturbing signal -again- by changing the transmitters output power it turned
out the even the handheld was hearing the signal. This was a breakthrough, just
accidental and a bit lucky that the handheld was not disturbed by the
transmitter output of 10W at that point. The handheld was a Kenwood TH-D7E, two
other Icom type were not able to hear the weak signal close to the 10W
transmitter signal 1.6MHz away.
Continuing the
experiments with the Kenwood, varying the output power seemed to let our
disturbing signal drift away. Some notes, just in case we might get a clue.
430.025 is our
transmitter frequency, okay the disturbing signal is around that frequency...
Great but where does it come from?
There were
locations inside the room, where the relay station and the central heating for
the apartments below, was as strong as an S9 signal. Should be traceable... That
was a reason to ask an enthousiastic radio directon finder. He was equipped
with an 2 meter ARDF device and a down converter to receive at the 70cm band. A
big advantage of an ARDF device is the adjustable RF gain, when searching close
to the signal it is very useful to reduce the sensitivity instead of trying to
head the difference between maximum and maximum.
At the location
of the relay it was hard to find the direction, the 10W transmitter signal slightly
affects the receiver. Ofcourse pointing the antenna into another direction also
changes the level of the transmitter’s signal which enters the ARDF receiver.
At first sight it
seemed to come from the citycenter, so we continued searching downstairs
heading towards the busy city center.
There was no
obvious signal apart from a weather station 300m away and a computer system at
the corner. The signal at the corner seemed to be a computer, fortunately
people are usually willing to help. Only in a few cases we have to ring and
explain some things but in most cases people are asking what’s happening when two
radio amateurs are lingering around the house with a huge antenna and noisy
handhelds. Ofcourse, it looks funny.
The computer was
not the problem, it produced a strong signal at the input frequency 431.625 MHz
but was not heard by the relay station.
Finally, back
upstairs at the relay station again, there was still the signal at the input
frequency but it looked like reflection against the wall of the apartment. Hard
to find out. However, in the staircase the signal seemed to come from one level
below us... Searching two levels lower the signal came from upstairs again. Would
it at last be the neighbour below the station? Fortunately somebody came home at
that address, we were allowed to come in and the signal went stronger and
stronger... Finally, closer and closer and at a certain moment i had to remove
the antenne form my handheld, the signal was too strong to see any difference
on the signal meter. We were pointed somewhere behind the tele, after switching
off equipment one by one it turns out to be a receiver of a remote controlled power
point.
After chatting a
while it tuned out that this neighbour moved here in the same period as we
changed from Storno to RS9044. Suddenly everything was clear now.
A few days later
i went to the DIY shop to buy a new set to swap them, but just to be sure i did
some measurements. To my astonishment these brand new devices are producing huge
spurious as soon a signal around 430MHz appears. Does not matter if it is 30mW
or 50W, there is noise produced between 380MHz and 460MHz. Taking a closer look
at the spurious generated by the receivers:
The largest
signal is the repeater output, all others are spurious signals produced by the
receiver.
Most of these
remote controlled things are working on the 432MHz LPD frequency. After
breaking open one of these receivers it seems to be very cheap designed, just a
super regenerative receiver which resonates at 432MHz. When a signal close to
the resonant frequency is applied the circuit this spurious is generated, when
the power of the relay is increased, the shift between the spikes is incrreasing.
The amplitude is about the same but the space between the spikes is changing. If
the relay station is receiving 1.6MHz higher, there is a great change that one
of these spikes appears at the receiver frequency.
I have a number
of different brands of these receivers tested but they all behave the same.
This kind of design ofcourse is very suitable for such an application, very
cheap and no issue to detect a wide modulated FM signal. So the most safe
solution was to look for an 862MHz version, we have found one which was 6 times
the price of the 432MHz type but after getting in contact with the station’s
neighbour to swap then, the problem was solved.
These remote
controlled sockets are very popular, in the Coversity project there are a
number of repeaters involved and now ans then the typical sound of these
sockets is heard. I think this is an important remark for repeater builders.